PARIS - Tunisia's "Jasmine revolution" is still unfolding, but we can already read lessons on democracy and democratization which go far beyond the Maghreb in it.
To set the jasmine revolution in historical perspective, we need to remember 4 June 1989 - the Central Sunday, the Poland voted the Communists, who crushed a budding democratic movement in Tiananmen Square by the power and at the other end of the Eurasia, China. A fork in the road of human history looks in retrospect that day. A path led to the downfall of communism and a new birth of freedom and democracy - sometimes bloody and painful – in Europe. The other path pursued an alternative (s) remaining under party control of course, with China, but masses impoverished delivering prosperity to his amazing and sustainable growth.
When the revolutionary year 1989 was unfolded, thought about Francis Fukuyama, Noir still controversial whether the path selected the "end of history. Europe" launched following Hegel, Fukuyama made the case that history is directional - it somewhere - results for two reasons. First, the restless spread of technology and the liberal economic order that has a homogenizing effect. Secondly was Hegelian "struggle for recognition" pervasive force of humanity, powerful enough to the countless individuals to the ultimate sacrifice lead.
But, held during a broad consensus that Communism was nothing but a dead end, China's economic success and the authoritarian backlash in Russia after Boris Yeltsin's retirement from the Kremlin a decade ago a pessimistic analysis prompted. Theories of "democratic rollback" and of a "Authoritarian powers" resurgence appeared to reveal the potential of systems combining capitalism nationalism and which status-led growth.
Some argued that authoritarian rule might be a much safer and more secure way to animal welfare as a democracy offer, others claimed the virtues of "Asian values" and others have praised the democracy in the Arab or Muslim world would only pave the way for Islamic fundamentalists to take power. Not surprisingly, autocrats embraced everywhere such views.
But the message of Tunisia Jasmine revolution rings loud and clear: democracy - liberal political order, where it is anchored - is not just a Western concept (or a Western conspiracy) and holds universal appeal, powered by craving for "Recognition." Moreover, it is accessible modernisation early in a country.
To be sure, the authoritarian rule of the early stage of industrialization can manage. But can't work any 'knowledge economy' with muzzle heads. Even the smartest authoritarian rulers are unable to manage complexity in this scale - not to mention corruption which inevitably breeds in the protected shadows of autocracy.
The American political scientist Daniel Deudney have a challenge of the "myth of autocratic rebirth", and John Ikenberry explores China and Russia found "little evidence of the emergence of a stable balance between capitalism and autocracy, that this combination as a new model of modernity could be worthy." While neither country as a liberal democracy qualifies both "are much more liberal and democratic, than you've ever been, and many of the critical foundations for sustainable liberal democracy"-a main obstacle is the centrifugal forces, democracy, to unleash the might.
But most are untroubled by such a threat that quietly or spectacular, rallied around the liberal order for decades. Asian countries such as South Korea, Japan, Taiwan and Indonesia have done this, without being hampered by their alleged "Asian values".
Similarly, Latin America, once the playground of the myriad juntas and golpes, now largely enshrines in political liberalism. Turkey is governed by a mild Islamist party that plays by the rules of democracy. And in early 2009, the presidential campaign in the Iran have announced a formidable yearning for freedom.
What is apparent from these cases is developing both channels, Fukuyama enabled identifies the direction of history as design: cumulative economic and technological change and the desire for recognition. Both the individual empowerment, which is the gateway to freedom and promote democracy. The paths differ between countries, setbacks are not unusual and it can take decades, but the crack can occur if the circumstances are right - as in Tunisia.
In fact the jasmine revolution embodies all the principles of liberal political order which in the West since 1941 Atlantic Charter advocates has been: a longing for freedom, opportunity and the rule of law. Moreover, Tunisia revolution was imported as part of some forced regime change, indigenous.
Tunisian people, led by a frustrated middle class who refused to be intimidated, have thus a healthy reminder that consistent and compelling forces the behavior of individuals and Nations today go. They illustrate the catalytic effect of digital connectivity (clearly visible under China's "classes Twitter"). And encourage accountability other Arab Nations, as in Egypt, the case may be, their rulers could impose.
What have the result in Tunisia those who believe that democracy, Woodrow Wilson, makes a place according to the world - and more democracy safe making it - every reason to rejoice in such auspicious development.
Pierre Bühler, former French diplomat, was an associate professor at Sciences Po, Paris Copyright: project syndicate/Institute of Humanities, 2011.
www.Project Syndicate.org you might also like to read more by Pierre Bühler or return to Our home page. Reprinting material from this site without written consent of project syndicate is a violation of international copyright. To secure permission, please contact distribution@project-syndicate.org.
No comments:
Post a Comment